Archive for June, 2010

Trucking Resources On Truckers’ Health Issues

Sunday, June 20, 2010
posted by 18 Wheeler 8:13 PM

Hello, Fellow Drivers,  I came across some trucking resources on diabetes, high blood pressure, and eating healthy.  There is a new trend that the Pilot truck stops are offering truckers.  They are wellness centers to help educate and support drivers in healthy lifestyles on the road.  Enjoy the read and remember to be safe out there. 

The most important tip is to stay consistent. Also, a good rule to remember is to eat closest to the natural source. In other words, stay away form processed foods; foods that have preservatives such as; corn syrup, high fructose corn syrup and partially hydrogenated oils. You will have to lean to read labels! Your life style will have to change to make a difference. Most important you need to create low stress in your life!

Good information to know!

The epidemic rate of obesity and diabetes plaguing our nation has created quite a stir in the health care community. No one challenges the clear association between increased body weight and risk of developing type 2 diabetes. But what isn’t clear is the cause of this obesity crisis, which affects nearly one-third of American adults and 16 percent of children.

Melissa Ohlson, MS, RD, LD, a registered dietitian and Nutrition Projects Coordinator of Preventive Cardiology and Rehabilitation at Cleveland Clinic, looks at obesity and diabetes, and answers questions about a potential root cause.

Isn’t obesity about eating too much and not exercising enough?
Ohlson: Eating too much and exercising too little has been ingrained in our brains to be the root cause of weight gain. And, as research has indicated, this much is true. But we can add to the obesity equation the increased availability of low cost nutrient-poor, calorie-rich foods; less physical and leisure activity; and low levels of fresh fruits, vegetables and whole grains in the American diet. Yet if weight gain were truly a matter of simple mathematics — calories in and calories out — one would surmise that fewer people in America would be struggling with their weight. This paradox has prompted researchers to look at other aspects of the diet for the answer.

Why single out one food ingredient?
Ohlson: Although it is almost certain there is no single cause for obesity and diabetes, some researchers have begun pointing the finger at specific foods and food ingredients. One such ingredient stands out at the top of their list: high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS). HFCS is produced by processing corn starch to yield glucose and fructose (sugar molecules). HFCS has the same sweetness and taste as an equal amount of sugar (sucrose), but is the preferred sweetener because it is less costly to manufacture and has a longer shelf life.

How prevalent is high-fructose corn syrup in the average diet?
Ohlson: The commercial use of HFCS began in the 1970s. Over the past 30 years, HFCS in the food supply jumped from less than 1 percent to over 40 percent, and now stands as the leading caloric sweetener added to foods and beverages. HFCS can be found in soft drinks and other beverages, and it is used to sweeten jams, condiments, breakfast cereals, baked goods, candy confections and prepared desserts. In an American Journal of Clinical Nutrition review, a conservative estimate of the consumption of HFCS indicates a daily average of 132 calories for all Americans over age 2. The top 20 percent of consumers of caloric sweeteners ingest roughly 316 calories from HFCS each day. If nothing else changes in a person’s diet or activity, this daily caloric excess over a year’s time would result in a weight gain of 13 to 33 pounds!

Aren’t all sugars the same?
Ohlson: Some researchers say the increased use of HFCS in the U.S. parallels the rapid increase in obesity experienced over the past few decades. What’s more, they say that calorie-laden sweetened beverages might actually enhance overeating. You see, fructose is absorbed differently than other sugars, and doesn’t register in the body metabolically the same way glucose does. For example, ingestion of glucose causes increased production of insulin in the pancreas in order for the body to take up and use glucose for energy. This rise in insulin triggers production of leptin, a hormone that regulates appetite and fat storage. Simultaneously, insulin suppresses ghrelin, another hormone made by the stomach that regulates hunger. Fructose functions differently. Unlike glucose, fructose does not stimulate insulin secretion, and therefore does not increase leptin production or suppress ghrelin. In other words, the body’s hunger/appetite signals do not respond. This suggests that consuming a lot of fructose over time could lead to weight gain.

Fructose also is preferentially metabolized to fat (triglyceride) in the liver. In research studies, intake of HFCS leads to hypertriglyceridemia, an independent risk factor for the development of heart disease. In additional studies, fructose consumption has been shown to induce insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance and hyperinsulinemia, all risk factors in the development of type 2 diabetes.

What are the results of studies performed in humans?
Ohlson: Those who object to the HFCS-obesity theory argue that sucrose (table sugar) is no different than HFCS. Sucrose is chemically made up of 50 percent glucose and 50 percent fructose. HFCS is not very different: Approximately 55 percent of HFCS comes from fructose and the other 45 percent glucose. Most studies conducted in humans have compared sucrose with HFCS, and little differences have been shown.
But this is not to say research hasn’t observed a link between HFCS to obesity or diabetes. In a study conducted on 50,000 female nurses between 1991 and 1999, weight gain over a four-year period was highest among women who increased their sugar-sweetened soft drink or fruit punch consumption from one or fewer drinks per week to one or more drinks per day. Women consuming one or more sugar-sweetened soft drinks per day had an 83 percent higher relative risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with those who consumed less than one of these beverages per month. Similarly, consumption of fruit punch was associated with increased diabetes risk.

Which is to blame — HFCS or over-consumption of calories?
Ohlson: In another study, per capita nutrient consumption in the U.S. between 1909 and 1997 obtained from the U.S. Department of Agriculture was compared with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Even after total calories were accounted for, corn syrup was positively associated with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.

Other trials have compared pure glucose to pure fructose in men and found pure fructose raises fasting blood triglycerides. Although these findings are interesting, they do not apply in a practical manner to the normal consumption in humans, since we consume foods that contain a mix of fructose and glucose, not fructose alone. In fact, a 2006 study compared the effects of equal amounts of soft drinks sweetened with sucrose; HFCS containing 45 percent fructose; HFCS containing 55 percent fructose; or aspartame (non-caloric sweetener). Researchers found that all the drinks with caloric sweeteners produced similar fullness responses and had the same effects on overall calorie intake.

So high-fructose corn syrup may or may not be the culprit?
Ohlson: Like many nutritional controversies, it appears the HFCS debate will continue for some time. While it may seem logical to blame HFCS for playing a role in the obesity epidemic, there is still a lack of solid evidence in the opinion of some researchers. They argue that if HFCS was not in our food supply, it is likely the obesity problem would still be here. This is because, whether it’s HFCS or sucrose, American’s are simply consuming too many calorie-rich, nutrient-poor foods like soft drinks, juices, baked goods, desserts and other “convenience” foods.

What’s your advice to readers?
Ohlson: First, fill your diet with nutrient-rich, lower-calorie fresh fruits, vegetables and whole grains. Second, regardless of the source, keep in mind “calories in and calories out.” Although weight control is more complex than that, even a small switch from one to two cans of soft drinks per day to water can make a difference. Only when we make these positive changes in our diets will the obesity and diabetes rates in this country begin to fall.

High blood pressure

Previous clients have had great success at lower blood pressure levels naturally by following these tips;

  1. 1.oat meal (not instant)
  2. 2.cinnamon
  3. 3.garlic
  4. 4.30 minute walk 3 to 4 days a week
  5. 5.eliminate all products with high fructose corn syrup

Trucking Business – Things To Consider

Friday, June 11, 2010
posted by 18 Wheeler 8:59 AM

Hello, Fellow Drivers,  I wanted to take a few moments to talk about getting started in the trucking business.  Some of you have commented that now is the best time to get a loan to start a trucking business.  While there is nothing wrong with borrowing money, it puts you at the mercy of the lender.  For instance, a typical truck and trailer loan will run an average of $2000 to $3000 per month, for about six years, depending on the type of rig and trailer you purchase.  That’s a lot of moolah to earn on the road, not to mention the fuel, maintenance and road expenses you also will incur. After owning my own trucking business for over 7 years, my suggestion is to start your business with some cash in the bank.  In other words, if you borrow the money for the rig, have three to six months of cash in the bank to run on until you are earning a steady income. 

Some of the comments from my readers entail borrowing money against your house, since interest rates are at an all time low (in some cases 3.5%).  I have been an entrepreneur for over 20 years and for almost 4 of those I managed a branch office for a major mortgage company.  Armed with “insider” knowledge of mortgage loans, my suggestion is to save up cash until you have a 3 to 6 month cushion in the bank (the more months saved the better).  Avoid borrowing against your most valued asset, your home.  For most hard-working Americans, this is their most valuable asset.  Keep it that way by leaving the equity in it.  I am also a real estate investor.  Before the real estate crash, I was able to purchase over $2 million in properties with no money down.  While that made me feel like a big shot, it put me in a leveraged position, leaving me vulnerable to my lenders.  I have been fortunate to be able to manage my properties well, but that is not the case with many investors.  My suggestion again, is to not leverage yourself to the point of vulnerability.  There is an old saying the finance world: CASH IS KING!  That saying will always ring true, no matter what the interest rates do.  The more liquid you are, the more power and freedom you will have in your business. 

Some of you will go ahead and borrow to the hills to get started in a trucking business.  You will also be wishing about 12 to 18 months into that leveraged position, when the loads are slim, that you had been more liquid.  You will have to stay out on the road until you meet your obligations, whereas if you were more liquid, you could enjoy more down time.  It is my wish that this blog has caused my readers to at least pause and think about the cost of debt. 

If you would, take some time to read my three-part blog dated 6/5/09, 6/8/09 and 6/9/09 on starting a trucking business.  It will give you valuable information about preparing before you venture out as an entrepreneur.  Enjoy the read and remember to be safe out there!

Trucking Industry News About TWIC Cards

Tuesday, June 8, 2010
posted by 18 Wheeler 7:08 PM

Hello, Fellow Drivers,  Many of you carry a TWIC  (Transportaion Worker Identification Credential) card to load and unload at the ports around the country.  I thought this was an interesting piece of trucking industry news which I found in a recent issue of Land Lind Magazine.  BTW (by the way), here is the website to find out all about TWIC cards and how to apply for one.  Enjoy the read and remember to be safe out there.

Truckers surprised by places they’re asked, and not asked, for TWIC card

 

 By Charlie Morasch
staff writer

 Gary Carr visits ports nearly every day.  Carr, an OOIDA member from Wayne, ME, hauls fish from the northeast to the West Coast, stopping at ports in Massachusetts, Maryland and Washington.  A year ago, Carr obtained a Transportation Worker Identification Credential card – a computer-chipped biometric ID card, which stores his fingerprints and U.S. documentation.  Carr said he’s rarely asked to show his TWIC. Instead, he’s allowed to drive within 10 feet of water, sometimes close to cargo and cruise ships after merely flashing his CDL.  “I don’t understand where it’s totally required and where it’s not,” Carr said. “I like the idea of TWIC. It just amazes me that the government required me to pay $132 for something I’m not using.”  Carr isn’t alone.  Thirty-eight percent of respondents in a landlinemag.com poll said their TWIC IDs were checked always or most of the time at ports; 29 percent said rarely; and 32 percent of respondents said they were never checked for TWIC at ports.  About 285,000 truckers have TWIC IDs, which last five years. The program has spent $171 million since 2003.  Increasingly, OOIDA members are using their TWIC cards when entering facilities that want to photocopy ID.  Carr prefers showing his TWIC, which doesn’t list personal information.  “Unless you know how to read that TWIC card, you’re not going to get anything off of it,” Carr said. “With a driver’s license, they’ve got a copy that can go anywhere after I show it.”  Truckers may be asked to show TWIC cards depending on whether they are in areas defined as “secure,” said TSA Spokesman Greg Soule.Coast Guard Spokeswoman Lisa Novak said she didn’t know of safety concerns regarding truckers not being asked to show TWIC cards.  Currently, 70 different card readers are being tested in pilot programs, including systems that require truckers to place fingers onto a scanner. The results of the pilot programs will be delivered to the Coast Guard this year before a final card reader rule is published. LL

Trucking Industry News – For All Seat Belt Rebels!

Monday, June 7, 2010
posted by 18 Wheeler 9:41 PM

Hello, Fellow Drivers,  Sorry for the long absence!  I came across this bit of trucking industry news in Land Line Magazine that pertains to wearing seat belts.  Most drivers hate the cotton pickin things so I thought this would be of interest to you “belt rebels” out there!  If  this Wisconsin bill is any indication of what the bears are up to in each state, I suggest you have your belt handy in case they are checking for seat belts  or you get stopped at the scales.  As of 2010, Florida changed it’s law so that bears can pull you over for just a seat belt infraction.  Prior to this year, bears had to stop you on another offense to be able to ticket you for just not wearing your seat belt.  Driving alert each day, keeps the bears away!  Enjoy the read and remember to be safe out there. 

Wisconsin lawmakers target unsafe driving

A handful of legislation drawing consideration in the Wisconsin statehouse intends to make the state’s roadways safer.

Rep. Gary Bies, R-Sister Bay, has offered a bill that would permit officers to pull over drivers not buckled up. Currently, law enforcement in the state can issue seat-belt citations to drivers only after stopping a vehicle for another traffic violation, such as speeding.

The bill – AB113 – would allow for primary enforcement of the state’s seat-belt law. It also would increase the fine for failure to adhere to the stricter rule from $10 to $25. No points would be assessed against violators’ driver’s licenses.

Opponents cite personal choice and the potential for racial profiling among the concerns about the stricter enforcement effort. Supporters say saving lives and the lure of federal money should be reason enough to approve the stricter rule.

If approved, Wisconsin would be line for a one-time $16 million payment from the federal government, the Pierce County Herald reported.

The 2005 Federal Highway Bill gives any state that adopts tougher seat-belt rules or achieves a belt usage rate of 85 percent one-time grant money equal to 500 percent of the highway funding the state received in 2003.

Wisconsin has a seat-belt usage rate of 73 percent.

There are 24 states without a primary seat-belt law. Maine’s recent adoption of the stricter rule brings to 25 the number of states that allow police to pull over drivers solely for not wearing their seat belts. New Hampshire is the only state without a mandatory seat-belt law of any kind.

Another of Bies’ bills in Wisconsin would clearly forbid drivers from watching television while behind the wheel.

State law already prohibits drivers from watching any device that receives a television broadcast signal if it’s located in front of the back of the driver’s seat or is visible to the driver – regardless of whether the device interferes with safe driving.

The bill – AB215 – would amend the law to prohibit drivers from watching any device capable of displaying live or recorded television, cable or satellite broadcasts, DVDs or video games that is located within the driver’s view.

The restriction wouldn’t apply to dashboard readouts or other displays of information about a vehicle’s operation or conduct. Drivers found in violation of the rule face fines up to $400.

One other bill – AB214 – would prohibit drivers under age 18 from talking on cell phones or sending text messages while behind the wheel when they have an instruction permit or are within the first nine months of holding a probationary license. It would exempt emergency phone calls.

Sponsored by Rep. Tony Staskunas, D-West Allis, the bill would have violators face fines as much as $400.

The distracted driving provisions would be added to other restrictions under Wisconsin’s graduated driver’s license program. Existing rules prohibit probationary license holders under age 18 from driving unsupervised between midnight and 5 a.m. and from transporting more than one passenger in the vehicle under age 18, unless they are relatives.

The bills are in the Assembly Transportation Committee.

– By Keith Goble, state legislative editor
keith_goble@landlinemag.com

Truckers and Travelers social media advertising by iePlexus.com.
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).